The majority of tests, except 1,3,9,11, generates this error: Connectivity dimension must be same as image
Do you think, I have an older version of skimage? or could it be another thing?
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:03 PM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Hi Everyone: I had implemented a watershed by numba, and now it has pass all the test_watershed check and got a exactly same result with skimage, support watershed-line, support connectivity, (pass test 0-12, but mine did not support compact yet)
It support nd, now only support uint8 image with uint16 marks. (because I think sometimes it is enough, It can process float image if it is needed)
And it is very smart and fast. less than 100 lines, and faster than skimage one. a 3d image which skimage run more than 10 minutes ( and I cannot wait any longer, so kill it), but my watershed just need 28 s.
The code are attached.
scikit-image mailing list email@example.com https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image