The segmentation did change, as a result of this PR:
https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/pull/666
In summary, the handling of the ratio/compactness parameter in scikit-image's SLIC was different from the reference implementation provided by the authors, and we fixed that between 0.8 and 0.9. If you fiddle with the compactness parameter, you should be able to get something close to your original segmentation.
I hope this helps!
Juan.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:08 AM, scott.richardson@visionsystemsinc.com <scott.richardson@visionsystemsinc.com> wrote:
I recently upgraded skimage from release 0.8.2.0 to 0.9.3 and noticed that I am getting back a different segmentation than I used to.--I see that @jni and @ahojnnes have made quite a few edits to skimage/segmentation/slic_superpixels.py and _slic.pyx, so I suspect that is expected, but I wanted to make sure it wasn't a regression.thanksScott
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.