On Mar 21, 2017, at 2:46 AM, Egor Panfilov <egor.v.panfilov@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Himanshu,

The bot looks really nice! What would be the pre-requisites from our side to deploy it?

@scikit-image/core,

I'd vote to give it a try. What do you think about 3-4 months probation period for the bot? During the period we could evaluate how well it supplements our current practices, and how the contributors are responding.

Regards,

Egor

2017-03-21 2:08 GMT+03:00 Stefan van der Walt <stefanv@berkeley.edu>:

This also came across my radar today:

https://landscape.io/

Stéfan

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017, at 14:33, Stefan van der Walt wrote:

Hi Himanshu

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017, at 12:24, Himanshu Mishra wrote:

I am not sure if this is the right place to talk about it, but a lot of times I have witnessed reviewers leave a little comment after reviewing the whole PR, and it is more or less about "some style issues. :)". It should be better for the reviewer to focus more on the implementation of the PR and leave the style issues to a bot. Thinking this in mind, a while ago, I created a Github Integration called PEP8 Speaks which automatically reviews the code style and comments on the Pull Request. It is written in Python and is open source. Github - https://github.com/orkohunter/pep8speaks

I've been wanting to put something like this in place for a while; so, if you're willing to help out, we'd be grateful.

We've also looked at Code Climate before; do you know how your proposed solution compares?

Thanks!

Stéfan

_______________________________________________
scikit-image mailing list
scikit-image@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image

_______________________________________________
scikit-image mailing list
scikit-image@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image