Nov. 8, 2012
6:58 p.m.
On Nov 8, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Zachary Pincus wrote:
Given this, clearly a two-pixel long path through pixels with value 255 will be lower-cost than a 300-pixel path through pixels with value 1.
Err, sorry, this is clearly in error. A two-pixel long path through pixels with value 255 will be lower-cost than a *600-pixel* path through pixels with value 1.