Hi Yan, See here: https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/issues/2636 Juan. On 1 Sep 2017, 6:07 PM +0300, imagepy@sina.com, wrote:
Hi Juan: What do you mean "undoing the speed regression of watershed"? I found watershed run very slowly with large image, and I am writting one with numba. YXDragon
----- 原始邮件 ----- 发件人：Juan Nunez-Iglesias <jni.soma@gmail.com> 收件人：scikit-image List Mailing <scikit-image@python.org>, "Mailing_list_for_scikit-image_(http://scikit-image.org)" <scikit-image@python.org> 主题：Re: [scikit-image] Release date for 0.14 日期：2017年09月01日 21点48分
Hi Egor,
Thanks for your support! I would prefer Nov 15 because I know for a fact that I will struggle to finish some of the major PRs that I need to get in before 0.14, including undoing the speed regression of watershed, and nd moments. (For the first one I don’t even know where to start currently.)
Juan.
On 1 Sep 2017, 12:31 PM +0300, Egor Panfilov <egor.v.panfilov@gmail.com>, wrote:
Dear all,
I propose to set a release date for scikit-image 0.14 on the mid of October (15th should do). Also, I'd volunteer to be a release manager for the release. Please, let me know if you agree. If so, I kindly ask you to take a deep breath and try to review some of the scheduled PRs in the coming month.
Thanks in advance, and have a nice we!
Regards, Egor Panfilov _______________________________________________ scikit-image mailing list scikit-image@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
scikit-image mailing list scikit-image@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image _______________________________________________ scikit-image mailing list scikit-image@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image