I'm not positive about this new criterion. My gut feeling is that it should be a bit nuanced on either side. For example, even if Tony doesn't write a single line for the paper, I still think he should be an author. Conversely, I don't think someone who has not thus far contributed a single line of code, issue, or tutorial should be able to jump in, write a few paragraphs, and be an author on the paper.

Having said that, I do agree that "core contributors" is too nebulous, so, for example, I'd be perfectly comfortable having François on the author list.

Juan.



On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <stefan@sun.ac.za> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Stéfan van der Walt <stefan@sun.ac.za> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Johannes Schönberger <jsch@demuc.de> wrote:
>> I also thought about contributing one example covering feature detection, extraction, matching and some simple image stitching using projective transformations... your thoughts? Is this too long?

By the way, you can make really nice panoramas if you export the
transformed images to TIFF and stitch them together using "enblend".
Since blending is not really in our scope, it's probably fine to use
that as the final component, if you want a particularly shiny result.

Stéfan

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.