I saw your post on the ImageJ list! =) imho that PR would be most welcome. On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Adam Hughes <hughesadam87@gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks. I suspect that the algorithm you guys have is probably a good solution for the encoding, and the fact that it gets a bit fuzzy at very low pixel count is just the price one pays for having a very applicable encoding algorithm. I noticed that imageJ's encoding outputs the same area and perimiter by the way, but they apply some sort of the correction before outputting circularity. If I get a chance to see what the circularity correction is; if it's not too hard, maybe I can put in a PR for a new descriptor called circularity to circularity_adjusted.

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:17 PM, Juan Nunez-Iglesias <jni.soma@gmail.com>wrote:

...

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Adam Hughes <hughesadam87@gmail.com>wrote:

...

Thanks Juan. Ya I had read that, sorry to make you post the source link. I guess I just wanted to confirm that what I was seeing made sense and was a product of the drawing routine rather than some sort of error or misinterpretation.

No worries. I'd like to be more help but this is not my code so I'm as familiar with it as you are. If you figure out a better approximation, a pull request would be very welcome! =)

Juan.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/scikit-image/vjOMjwaWwg4/unsubscribe. To unsubscribe from this group and all of its topics, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.