@Chintak,

Juan, 0.9 might have been a more plausible value, since if I'm not mistaken it is "number of pixels in image / number of pixels in the convex hull". Convex hull image will have more number of pixels. ;)

No, the number of pixels in the convex hull will be greater than *or equal to *the number of pixels in the object. Hence 1.0 is the upper bound. When using flag values, you usually want values outside the normal range, or at the edge of it at least!

Juan are you taking this issue up?

I can look at it, but I have a busy few weeks ahead... We'll see which of us finishes their current agenda first! =) On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Chintak Sheth <chintaksheth@gmail.com>wrote:

Hi,

Juan are you taking this issue up? Else I wouldn't mind taking a go at it though I first need to complete the Cython implementation of Fast Marching Method code. Once I have that all ready for the PR I don't mind taking a shot here.

Chintak On Jul 11, 2013 4:12 PM, "Stéfan van der Walt" <stefan@sun.ac.za> wrote:

...

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Chintak Sheth <chintaksheth@gmail.com> wrote:

...

First, I think we need to find why the dual nature, `convex_hull_image` independently works fine but not from `regionprops`.

Spot on. Thanks for following through!

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.