I'm in GMT+3. Today I'm going to finish the review of 0.14 milestone, prepare the release notes, and go for a dry-run of the release. Please, let me which tool would you like to use for the interactive chat on the potential questions.
As for flood fill, if there is an urgent need in the algorithm for the upcoming tutorial sessions, and if Josh has everything already implemented, I think, it could easily go to `skimage.future` right away (or with 0.14.1, of course). We can then re-iterate on the API, and improve the implementation in other ways.
вт, 22 мая 2018 г., 5:11 Juan Nunez-Iglesias email@example.com:
Hello everyone, and thanks for the robust response! =)
Josh, there is no urgency in getting flood fill into 0.14.0. It can go into 0.14.1 equally well. Actually my goal is for 0.14.0 to be out before next week's sprint *and* possibly to do generic flood-fill with LowLevelCallable support during the sprint. These goals are mutually exclusive with having flood fill in 0.14.0. And, incidentally, I would think that nD basic flood-fill should be as easy as 2D given the offsets_to_neighbors functions in watershed/the local_maxima PR. I would *very* much prefer to have an nD flood-fill from the beginning. What is "basic" flood fill btw? Same value as starting index?
Egor, awesome that you can do the release. As to the timing, given Stéfan's suggestion that we should have a round of review of the release notes before the actual release, *and* that I am flying MEL-SFO on Thursday, do you think we could do this today or tomorrow (Wednesday)? Today would be much less hectic for me, but tomorrow would be ok. What is your timezone btw?
Stéfan, as to pre-releases, it is a good idea, but I would target that for 0.15 or maybe even 0.14.1. I don't want to change the release process right this second.
Onwards and upwards!
Juan. _______________________________________________ scikit-image mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image