Re: [scikit-image] Benchmark of image processing libraries
Hi Sourav,
Yes, improving performance is something that’s in the roadmap (this roadmap exists only in the heads of several core developers — something else that needs to be rectified). It just hasn’t been emphasised for lack of developer time.
A very specific goal that I’ve had for a while is to set up integration for the project with airspeed velocity. Once we have that, the performance of the library should progressively improve, simply by having performance be a more visible goal.
For this, we need a dedicated machine to run benchmarks. Stéfan, do you think you could make/host one at BIDS?
Juan.
On 19 Nov 2017, 1:15 AM +1100, Sourav Singh
Hello,
I am writing the mail with reference to the tweet made by Jeremy Howard here- https://twitter.com/jeremyphoward/status/931761385628778496
Here, he did an image rotation for all the existing image processing libraries in Python and noted that vips is better than scipy in terms of speed.
I am interested to know if there is anything that could be done regarding the problem.
Regards,
Sourav _______________________________________________ scikit-image mailing list scikit-image@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017, at 15:55, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
For this, we need a dedicated machine to run benchmarks. Stéfan, do you think you could make/host one at BIDS? Yes, I can probably make available a machine for this purpose. Who will volunteer to set it up? Stéfan
participants (2)
-
Juan Nunez-Iglesias
-
Stefan van der Walt