Just to be sure: when doing "pip install scikit-image", there's no need for cython to be installed (any version of cython), right? The .c are shipped with the .tar.gz on PyPi, so I guess it should be fine without Cython... Emma On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 12:43:04AM -0800, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
Hi Jean-Patrick
On 7 March 2016 at 00:06, Jean-Patrick Pommier <jeanpatrick.pommier@gmail.com> wrote:
'/tmp/pip-build-rR00uc/scikit-image/skimage/morphology/_skeletonize_3d_cy.pyx.in'
scikit-image now requires a newer version of Cython to build. See:
https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/blob/master/DEPENDS.txt#L5
Best regards Stéfan
@Emma, that sounds right. So, maybe there is something else wrong?
On Mar 7, 2016, at 8:31 PM, Emmanuelle Gouillart <emmanuelle.gouillart@nsup.org> wrote:
Just to be sure: when doing "pip install scikit-image", there's no need for cython to be installed (any version of cython), right? The .c are shipped with the .tar.gz on PyPi, so I guess it should be fine without Cython...
Emma
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 12:43:04AM -0800, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
Hi Jean-Patrick
On 7 March 2016 at 00:06, Jean-Patrick Pommier <jeanpatrick.pommier@gmail.com> wrote:
'/tmp/pip-build-rR00uc/scikit-image/skimage/morphology/_skeletonize_3d_cy.pyx.in'
scikit-image now requires a newer version of Cython to build. See:
https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/blob/master/DEPENDS.txt#L5
Best regards Stéfan
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send an email to scikit-image@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/scikit-image/20160307193103.GA1028544%40ph.... For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 08:52:20PM +0100, Johannes Schönberger wrote:
@Emma, that sounds right. So, maybe there is something else wrong?
yes, that was something else that was solved by Stéfan in 0.12.1. I was just replying to this e-mail since it was the one that mentioned cython
On 7 March 2016 at 12:15, Emmanuelle Gouillart <emmanuelle.gouillart@nsup.org> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 08:52:20PM +0100, Johannes Schönberger wrote:
@Emma, that sounds right. So, maybe there is something else wrong?
yes, that was something else that was solved by Stéfan in 0.12.1. I was just replying to this e-mail since it was the one that mentioned cython
Right, so what was happening is that the .in file was missing, so the build process could not check whether the generated .pyx file was outdated or not. Stéfan
participants (3)
-
Emmanuelle Gouillart -
Johannes Schönberger -
Stéfan van der Walt