`min_size` argument in Feltzenswalb segmentation has no effect
Hi all, The title says it, with a recent 0.9dev version of skimage, I can't see an effect of the `min_size` argument in Felzenszwalb segmentation. BTW the meaning of this argument is not very clear in the doc. It's the first time I use this function, so I don't know wether this is a regression or not. Reading the code, I fail to understand how this all works.... Here is a notebook showing the (lack of) effect of min_size: http://nbviewer.ipython.org/7023716 Cheers, good luck with the realease Guillaume
Hi Guillaume On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Guillaume Gay <guillaume@mitotic-machine.org> wrote:
The title says it, with a recent 0.9dev version of skimage, I can't see an effect of the `min_size` argument in Felzenszwalb segmentation. BTW the meaning of this argument is not very clear in the doc. It's the first time I use this function, so I don't know wether this is a regression or not.
Reading the code, I fail to understand how this all works....
I can verify the bug, but the code looks okay, so it's something a bit more subtle. I'll have a look at this again later. We may have to include this as a 0.9.1 bugfix. https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/issues/793 Stéfan
participants (2)
-
Guillaume Gay -
Stéfan van der Walt