Sorry guys, things aren't looking good for the license. Manuel was kind enough to reply to me and to forward my message to James Fienup, but it seems the license (or lack thereof) was already a point of contention between Manuel and James. I'm going to leave my branch open for anyone wanting to use the code, but I think it's better to not include officially until a license is determined for the parent work. https://github.com/msarahan/scikit-image/tree/PhaseCorrelation Best, Michael On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Juan Nunez-Iglesias <jni.soma@gmail.com>wrote:

On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <stefan@sun.ac.za>wrote:

...

Perhaps Juan can answer this one--he is our most vocal 3D proponent!

Haha, 3D is not the same as 2D+c! I'm actually also used to grayscale EM images, but in 3D. For that case, I think the generalisation would be straightforward. For 2D+c, I have no idea!

In the meanwhile, getting a version up and running with tests in 2D is

...

a great start.

Or 3D grayscale. Just a suggestion. ;)

Juan.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.