Hi St�fan
If you had a mask for an individual superpixel, and indices into your array, x, y, z, you can imagine finding the coordinates of all pixels under that mask with
x[mask], y[mask], z[mask]
The mask you typically recover from a label image, so, e.g., mask = (labels == 3).
Thanks.
Now, the trickier problem is figuring out where, relative to other super-pixels, this one is located. For that, it may be better to represent the image as a graph, where each node represents a super-pixel, and edges represent links to other super-pixels (in fact, I assumed/hoped there is some python based graph library that was numpy friendly.
this is something we should implement in scikit-image to make handling labels easier).
Would you be interested in collaborating on such a feature? Sure. I am still feeling my way, but am willing to contribute what every way I can.
Regards, Michael. --
Hi, If you look for a numpy friendly gtraph library, I would strongly recommend graph-tool <http://projects.skewed.de/graph-tool/> It's verry efficient, well documented and Tiago answers really quickly to questions on the mailing list. Plus it's package for debian distros. Cheers, Guillaume Le 22/04/2013 10:46, Brickle Macho a écrit :
Hi Stéfan
If you had a mask for an individual superpixel, and indices into your array, x, y, z, you can imagine finding the coordinates of all pixels under that mask with
x[mask], y[mask], z[mask]
The mask you typically recover from a label image, so, e.g., mask = (labels == 3).
Thanks.
Now, the trickier problem is figuring out where, relative to other super-pixels, this one is located. For that, it may be better to represent the image as a graph, where each node represents a super-pixel, and edges represent links to other super-pixels (in fact, I assumed/hoped there is some python based graph library that was numpy friendly.
this is something we should implement in scikit-image to make handling labels easier).
Would you be interested in collaborating on such a feature? Sure. I am still feeling my way, but am willing to contribute what every way I can.
Regards,
Michael.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Guillaume Gay <guillaume@mitotic-machine.org> wrote:
If you look for a numpy friendly gtraph library, I would strongly recommend graph-tool
Thanks for the pointer; graph-tools does look like a fantastic tool. I don't think we're quite ready for the dependency on Boost, though. Stéfan
participants (3)
-
Brickle Macho
-
Guillaume Gay
-
Stéfan van der Walt