I am hesitant to do that, because we expressly decided not have feature-hunting as a goal. Speed comparisons are fine: it will probably show that we are comparable, but not the fastest (not currently one of our primary aims--but that could change in the future).
Just an idea… I’m also hesitant as it is always very difficult to compare functions, which itself have different parameters and options.
1. Introduction and motivation 2. Purpose a) Research b) Education c) Industry 3. Gallery of examples 4. Development practices 5. Conclusion
Looks like a sane choice. Another idea: „Outlook & Future roadmap“? Splitting up the sections is a good idea, I think, although the text may sound a bit conglomerate as everyone has a different style and level of writing. So, I absolutely encourage you to correct me. Johannes
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Johannes Schönberger <jsch@demuc.de> wrote:
Splitting up the sections is a good idea, I think, although the text may sound a bit conglomerate as everyone has a different style and level of writing. So, I absolutely encourage you to correct me.
Let's do first drafts, and then review and rework one another's sections? Stéfan
participants (2)
-
Johannes Schönberger
-
Stéfan van der Walt