I think a better ideas is to mark the article for deletion (and I've done so), as it's meaningless (any of those algorithms could be coded in python, matlab, or mathematica), it doesn't list arguably more popular image processing tools (e.g., ImageJ, OpenCV), and the list seems arbitrarily constructed. Far better would be to add links from each of the algorithms' pages to the software that implements that particular algorithm.

I totally agree here.