I also thought about contributing one example covering feature detection, extraction, matching and some simple image stitching using projective transformations... your thoughts? Is this too long? On Feb 5, 2014, at 9:56, Johannes Schönberger <jsch@demuc.de> wrote:

Fully agree on all your thoughts!

On Feb 5, 2014, at 9:45, Stéfan van der Walt <stefan@sun.ac.za> wrote:

...

Hi all,

Working on the scikit-image paper, I've had some further thoughts about authorship (yes, this is much harder than writing the paper :).

I suggest the following (what I consider to be) fair guideline:

1) Anyone who contributes significantly to the writing of the paper gets their name in the authors list 2) All other contributors are included in the "scikit-image contributors" author

To me, this feels like the fairest way to reward those who time into writing the paper, while also giving credit to all of those whose work is described therein. I felt uncomfortable adding all "core contributors" to the authors list, since that concept is becoming more and more nebulous with GitHub PRs.

I'd like to hear your thoughts.

Stéfan

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.