On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:44:11PM -0800, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
On 2 March 2016 at 13:24, Emmanuelle Gouillart <emmanuelle.gouillart@nsup.org> wrote:
#1937 highlights a bug in our tests (and failing tests, that aren't currently showing up), so I would consider that the last blocker.
#1937 is a bug fix, so should be merged. The real problem is the bug that it exposes, which is
I will work on fixing it this afternoon.
Thanks :-D
Bug fixes seem precisely inessential to get done ahead of release? Anything that doesn't break the API can be added in 0.12.1? On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Emmanuelle Gouillart < emmanuelle.gouillart@nsup.org> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:44:11PM -0800, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
On 2 March 2016 at 13:24, Emmanuelle Gouillart <emmanuelle.gouillart@nsup.org> wrote:
#1937 highlights a bug in our tests (and failing tests, that aren't currently showing up), so I would consider that the last blocker.
#1937 is a bug fix, so should be merged. The real problem is the bug that it exposes, which is
I will work on fixing it this afternoon.
Thanks :-D
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send an email to scikit-image@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/scikit-image/20160302215220.GC3276684%40ph... . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
participants (2)
-
Emmanuelle Gouillart -
Juan Nunez-Iglesias