Re: [scikit-image] Future of nose and issues for scikit-image
Hello Nelle, Thank you for your nice proposition, it's really appreciated. To me, this sounds like the way to move but let's wait for other reactions. Best, -- François Boulogne. http://www.sciunto.org GPG: 32D5F22F
Hi François Thanks for bringing this up. I've now started using pytest for new projects, and I think it's possible to have a test suite that runs under both that and nose. However, I'm not sure if such backward compatibility gives us significant advantage, and suggest we make pytest the recommended and default way of running the test suite. Best regards Stéfan On December 31, 2016 02:43:04 François Boulogne <fboulogne@sciunto.org> wrote:
Hello Nelle,
Thank you for your nice proposition, it's really appreciated. To me, this sounds like the way to move but let's wait for other reactions.
Best,
-- François Boulogne. http://www.sciunto.org GPG: 32D5F22F
_______________________________________________ scikit-image mailing list scikit-image@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
Hi all, I agree with Stéfan that a forward-looking clean break would be best. It looks like a rather large undertaking though, judging from https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/5405 <https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/5405>. Regards, Steve
On Dec 31, 2016, at 1:29 PM, Stefan van der Walt <stefanv@berkeley.edu> wrote:
Hi François
Thanks for bringing this up. I've now started using pytest for new projects, and I think it's possible to have a test suite that runs under both that and nose. However, I'm not sure if such backward compatibility gives us significant advantage, and suggest we make pytest the recommended and default way of running the test suite.
Best regards Stéfan
On December 31, 2016 02:43:04 François Boulogne <fboulogne@sciunto.org> wrote:
Hello Nelle,
Thank you for your nice proposition, it's really appreciated. To me, this sounds like the way to move but let's wait for other reactions.
Best,
-- François Boulogne. http://www.sciunto.org GPG: 32D5F22F
_______________________________________________ scikit-image mailing list scikit-image@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
_______________________________________________ scikit-image mailing list scikit-image@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016, at 15:05, Steven Silvester wrote:
I agree with Stéfan that a forward-looking clean break would be best. It looks like a rather large undertaking though, judging from https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/5405.
Perhaps we are better off than matplotlib: $ git grep "from nose" skimage/_shared/testing.py: from nose.tools import assert_less skimage/_shared/testing.py: from nose.tools import assert_greater skimage/_shared/tests/test_testing.py:from nose.tools import (assert_true, assert_raises, assert_equal) skimage/draw/tests/test_draw3d.py:from nose.tools import raises skimage/io/tests/test_sift.py:from nose.tools import * skimage/novice/tests/test_novice.py:from nose.tools import assert_true skimage/segmentation/tests/test_quickshift.py:from nose.tools import assert_true skimage/util/tests/test_montage.py:from nose.tools import assert_equal, raises skimage/util/tests/test_shape.py:from nose.tools import raises Stéfan
participants (3)
-
François Boulogne -
Stefan van der Walt -
Steven Silvester