I am seeing some chatter on github about the differences between CIELUV and CIELAB. My understanding is that the committee could not agree on a single standard and didnt feel they could approve CIELAB alone.
Isaac
On Monday, October 21, 2013 3:19:33 AM UTC-4, Stefan van der Walt wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Isaac Gerg <isaac...@gergltd.comjavascript:> wrote:
According to "Principles of Color Technology" by Roy S. Berns, it is a
myth
that" CIELAB was recommended for large color differences and tha tCIELUV
was
recommended for small color differences." It is also a myth that
"CIELAB is
recommended for reflecting samples while CIELUV is recommended for
sources
and displays." The second myth is what I originally stated as fact but
is
incorrect.
This makes for good docstrings!
Stéfan
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Isaac Gerg isaac.gerg@gergltd.com wrote:
I am seeing some chatter on github about the differences between CIELUV and CIELAB. My understanding is that the committee could not agree on a single standard and didnt feel they could approve CIELAB alone.
Did they provide some motivation as to why not, or why both standards are needed?
Stéfan
participants (2)
-
Isaac Gerg -
Stéfan van der Walt