On 17 May 2013 09:29, Stéfan van der Walt email@example.com wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Josh Warner firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
I'll take the opposite position for purposes of debate on PEP8 in Travis.
How about only including it as part of the Travis build report (but not failing)?
We do this on sklearn with ShiningPanda: it means we can see regressions in pep8 compliance code. That also means you need someone to regularly check ShiningPanda.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to email@example.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.