Regarding the `scipy.ndimage.label` changes coming in 0.13, see the discussion in Issue #495<https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/issues/495> and the partial fix in merged Issue #498<https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/issues/498>; I think there are still ~4 or so outstanding cases from #495. On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:33:21 AM UTC-5, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Josh Warner <silvertr...@gmail.com<javascript:>
wrote:
(like the change of `scipy.ndimage.label` coming in 0.13)
Huh? For the less-informed among us, could you elaborate? A quick Googling was not informative... And I have (approximately) 5 bajillion functions that depend on `nd.label`. =)
If this were to be implemented, would our policy then be to use relative
imports for the wrapped versions of these functions internally, rather than importing from SciPy?
I hadn't considered this but it makes a lot of sense, as it potentially slowly decouples scikit-image from its scipy dependency.
FYI, the Scipy PR in questions which is causing the problem with scipy.ndimage.label is #240 <https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/240> and #261 <https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/261>. Both of which try to address Trac ticket 1491 <https://github.com/scipy-gitbot/scipy-trac-migration/issues/1489> - Jonathan Helmus (the ticket creator...) On 4/24/2013 7:33 PM, Josh Warner wrote:
Regarding the `scipy.ndimage.label` changes coming in 0.13, see the discussion in Issue #495 <https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/issues/495> and the partial fix in merged Issue #498 <https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/issues/498>; I think there are still ~4 or so outstanding cases from #495.
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:33:21 AM UTC-5, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Josh Warner <silvertr...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote:
(like the change of `scipy.ndimage.label` coming in 0.13)
Huh? For the less-informed among us, could you elaborate? A quick Googling was not informative... And I have (approximately) 5 bajillion functions that depend on `nd.label`. =)
If this were to be implemented, would our policy then be to use relative imports for the wrapped versions of these functions internally, rather than importing from SciPy?
I hadn't considered this but it makes a lot of sense, as it potentially slowly decouples scikit-image from its scipy dependency.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Oh that! Right, I just didn't really consider that an API change since the function signature is unchanged, and label was never really intended for use with asymmetric structuring elements, afaik... =) thanks for the link! On Thursday, April 25, 2013, Josh Warner wrote:
Regarding the `scipy.ndimage.label` changes coming in 0.13, see the discussion in Issue #495<https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/issues/495> and the partial fix in merged Issue #498<https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/issues/498>; I think there are still ~4 or so outstanding cases from #495.
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:33:21 AM UTC-5, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Josh Warner <silvertr...@gmail.com>wrote:
(like the change of `scipy.ndimage.label` coming in 0.13)
Huh? For the less-informed among us, could you elaborate? A quick Googling was not informative... And I have (approximately) 5 bajillion functions that depend on `nd.label`. =)
If this were to be implemented, would our policy then be to use relative
imports for the wrapped versions of these functions internally, rather than importing from SciPy?
I hadn't considered this but it makes a lot of sense, as it potentially slowly decouples scikit-image from its scipy dependency.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'scikit-image%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com');>. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
participants (3)
-
Jonathan J. Helmus -
Josh Warner -
Juan Nunez-Iglesias