Re: Edge detectors in filter package
Basically, "filter" is a very universal term that may be used for lots of image processing related tasks… On the one hand, edge operators probably fit well into the feature package, on the other hand Tony just used the very common term
edge filters
So, I am +-0 on this… Johannes Schönberger Am 21.04.2013 um 17:56 schrieb Tony Yu <tsyu80@gmail.com>:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Ankit Agrawal <aaaagrawal@gmail.com> wrote: Hi everyone,
I would like to know the motivation behind keeping edges.py(edge detectors) in filters package. Based on the Image Processing terminology , I think features package is a more appropriate place for it. Thank you.
I've always thought that edge filters belonged in the features package, too. There's always the question of whether deprecating the current behavior is worth the trouble. I'm +1, despite the pain of deprecation.
Cheers, -Tony
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Johannes Schönberger < jschoenberger@demuc.de> wrote:
Basically, "filter" is a very universal term that may be used for lots of image processing related tasks… On the one hand, edge operators probably fit well into the feature package, on the other hand Tony just used the very common term
edge filters
So, I am +-0 on this…
I'd agree that `sobel`, `prewitt`, etc. are filters, but I think `canny` is much less of a traditional filter. That said, it's not a big deal either way. -Tony
participants (2)
-
Johannes Schönberger
-
Tony Yu