![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/60e03bd1fd9f2dbc750e0899b9e7e71d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
13 May
2008
13 May
'08
1:52 a.m.
2008/5/13 David Cournapeau <david@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp>:
Nathan Bell wrote:
I don't see how this addresses David's argument.
I understand that Robert's position is if supporting too many backends is a burden, just drop mkl and fftw(2/3). Supporting fftpack and djbfft only would certainly be much easier.
Well, for people that want Matlab-fast FFT (and those are the people you want to satisfy with the plug-in system with numpy), dropping the fastest libraries is not the best way to get them. Just my two cents. Matthieu -- French PhD student Website : http://matthieu-brucher.developpez.com/ Blogs : http://matt.eifelle.com and http://blog.developpez.com/?blog=92 LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher