On Sat, 17 Apr 2004, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Does this need to go into 0.3 (i.e. rebuild the binaries to include it)?
It seems our 'tagging' is a bit shaky at this point.
Travis
It's not critical. Some shared libraries were just installed into the site-packages directory instead of underneath in scipy. Shouldn't affect any behavior.
-Travis O.
I agree that there should not be any affect on the behaviour, though it introduces mismatch in tagged CVS repository and released binary and source files. I just hope that nobody will notice that when using scipy and upgrading scipy in future (the ../site-packages/moduleTNC.so will be there foreever..). Anyway, I just tagged the CVS repository with tag v0_3_0. I have fixed several links in the new scipy.org (replaced .html->.txt where appropiate) and it looks like we are ready to send the release announcement out. Any takers for composing the announcement? Few issues: 1) Need contents for http://www.scipy.org/development/maintainers.html 2) Top in scipy.org shows: PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU COMMAND 25930 zope 15 0 814M 218M 1664 S 0.0 34.7 66:42 0 python2.3 that is zope is taking lots of memory. Could this explain why the site is so slow? Maybe restarting zope would free some memory? Regards, Pearu