On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> wrote:
la, 2017-09-09 kello 15:24 +1200, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
I agree. That new version addresses my concern about the harsh tone of version 1.2.
Overall there seems to be a preference for the Contributor Covenant or at least something of that level of conciseness, rather than the Jupyter/Django style CoC. So let's go in that direction.
The text of the current version of the Contributor Covenant seems easy to understand and fairly reasonable to me. The scope where it applies is clearly defined, and essentially codifies not accepting wildly unprofessional behavior on scipy issue trackers etc. It is also adopted by a number of other projects, so I think it is a better starting point.
Agreed. There's also the Apache one ( https://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct.html, thanks to Stefan for the suggestion), which is also clear and concise, and has a much friendlier tone than the Contributor Covenant. Ralf