On 16 May 2021, at 02:48, Tyler Reddy <tyler.je.reddy@gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________There's also a request for core devs to "tie break" a decision here: https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/11263#issuecomment-840265287On Sat, 15 May 2021 at 18:26, Tyler Reddy <tyler.je.reddy@gmail.com> wrote:Hi,A few PRs that might benefit from some extra attention:- a stats PR with a tricky debate related to the "nan" policy: https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/13572#discussion_r625334934- a set of alternate PRs that have been described as one of the bigger pain points for optimize: https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/13143#issuecomment-841737552Best wishes,TylerOn Mon, 3 May 2021 at 04:43, Ilhan Polat <ilhanpolat@gmail.com> wrote:I would also appreciate if other win users can give it a go. It might be the case that my system is the exception so we can ignore my issue._______________________________________________On Sun, 2 May 2021, 21:08 Ralf Gommers, <ralf.gommers@gmail.com> wrote:_______________________________________________On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 7:38 PM Tyler Reddy <tyler.je.reddy@gmail.com> wrote:Hi,SciPy 1.6.0 was released December 31/2020 (a bit late), a little more than 4 months ago, and I think we'd like to keep a roughly biannual release cadence.I'd like to proposed the following schedule for 1.7.0:- May 26/2021: branch 1.7.x
- May 29/2021: rc1
- June 11/2021: rc2 (if needed)- June 20/2021: final releaseSounds good to me.As always, it is a good idea to start tagging things that should be in the 1.7.0 release & please do help with reviewing PRs/issues that are tagged--current counts are:- PRs: 24 open with 1.7.0 milestone- issues: 8 open with 1.7.0 milestoneAlso great to update the release notes wiki as appropriate: https://github.com/scipy/scipy/wiki/Release-note-entries-for-SciPy-1.7.0Thoughts/objections for the proposed schedule? The new build time dependency/transpiler, Pythran, would be a notable addition to this release, assuming that moves forward.There's a couple of nice PRs pending that depend on it with only a pure Python fallback. While I'm pretty happy with how the use of Pythran is shaping up, I think we should leave it as an optional build dependency only for this release, and try to make it non-optional afterwards. There's always the chance we'll find something unexpected in the release, and there's Windows build thing that needs sorting out - it works for all wheels, but Ilhan is having some trouble with a local build setup.Cheers,Ralf
SciPy-Dev mailing list
SciPy-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
SciPy-Dev mailing list
SciPy-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
SciPy-Dev mailing list
SciPy-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev