I guess this problem of dependency could be avoid with a custom installation.
MPI code could be compile only if specify, in a similar fashion than the mkl library for Blas/Lapack wrappers.
On 10/04/2017 04:59 PM, Joshua Wilson via gpaw-users wrote:
gpaw-users mailing listJust off the cuff I'd guess that the BLACS dependency would make it
very difficult to support Scalapack in SciPy proper.
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 8:45 AM, marc <marc.barbry@mailoo.org> wrote:
Dear Scipy developers,______________________________
We are actually writing a python wrapper for Scalapack that seems to be
cruelly missing for computational science with Python.
Since Scipy has already wrappers for Blas and Lapack library we are hoping
that you could be interested as well in a Scalapack wrapper.
In this aim, we used f2py to wrap the routine as it is done in the
Blas/Lapack wrapper of Scipy.
The actual code can be found in the following repository,
https://gitlab.com/mbarbry/python-scalapack
Since the project just started, only few routines are implemented, but we
manage to write a working test with sygv routine.
We would like to know if the Scipy community would be interested to merge
this wrapper in the Scipy code in the future?
We believe that Scalapack is an important part of the Scientific tools for
linear algebra, and that Scipy would only benefit of such wrapper as well
than the Scientific community.
Contributions to the code are obviously more than welcome.
Best regards,
Marc Barbry
_______________________________________________
SciPy-Dev mailing list
SciPy-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
_________________
gpaw-users@listserv.fysik.dtu.dk
https://listserv.fysik.dtu.dk/mailman/listinfo/gpaw-users
_______________________________________________
SciPy-Dev mailing list
SciPy-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev