9 Apr
2009
9 Apr
'09
2:43 p.m.
On 04/09/09 18:04, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
The "workflow" of the average sciuentific programmer has a big potential for improvement, and one cannot bring that about by further fragmentation.
I was not advocating fragmentation, any viable solution would be fine. IIRC, SPD itself is based on Sage and surely there will be some exchange of code/ideas between Sage and SPD at some time. However, given a choice I would prefer a modular set of packages rather than one monolithic monster. I haven't delved into all the existing solutions enough to know if they are sufficiently modular or not. The very fact that SPD exists suggests that there is scope for improvement. cheers, prabhu