6 Sep
2016
6 Sep
'16
3:40 a.m.
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016, at 12:42, Evgeni Burovski wrote:
If we want to be fancy and can't find a better alternative, we can consider a EU presidency model where the deciding vote position is rotating among the dev team on a time basis.
As Matthew mentioned, I am indeed very interested in this conversation, since we're also investigating potential governance models for scikit-image. My feeling is that having a clear leader in place is important, so I'm also leaning away from the numpy model towards one where responsibilities are more explicitly assigned. Exactly how to best make that assignment is still unclear to me. Stéfan