"Travis" == Travis Oliphant <oliphant@ee.byu.edu> writes:
Travis> 1) Do you like the idea ? I think this is a very good idea. Some people are likely to claim "nothing new in the particular implementation". However, you could insist that code contributed here should be unit tested and reasonably integration tested (how often do we see anything close to that in other papers?). It might be a good idea to have two kinds of contributions, "original/new ideas/algorithms/applications" and "new implementations". Most papers, it would appear, are read by a handful and used by an even smaller subset of the audience. The advantage of something contributed to SciPy is that it has (on the average) far greater utility to the whole community. Besides, I think it is reasonable to argue that good code usually takes as long as (if not longer than) writing a paper. Travis> 2) Could you help (i.e. as an editor, reviewer, etc.)? I can try to help with this. cheers, prabhu