On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Tom Grydeland <tom.grydeland@gmail.com>wrote:
On 2014-03-21, at 00:05, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers@gmail.com> wrote:
Some motivation for why the original Anderson algorithm is still suitable to add to Scipy would be useful.
When I have to start _motivating_ my contributions, I think my work is done.
Until this has been decided, I guess there's no point in addressing your other comments.
I'm sorry, but that's a perfectly valid question for any algorithms we add. I spent quite a bit of effort looking at your code and checking the literature. If we're going to have to deprecate these functions again later because they're not accurate enough while there are improved ones around, we do our users a disservice. If there's another dev who happens to be an expert to whom it's obvious that this is a good way to add hankel0/1 (Robert?), then fine. Otherwise you're going to have to help me a bit. Ralf