Pearu Peterson schrieb:
Hi,
I think we are ready to make the release: with the recent Scipy from CVS all tests pass ok on Debian (sid) P4 and AMD MP boxes, Gentoo Opteron box, and a WinNT box.
If you think that there are some important bugs to be fixed, you still got about 12 hours. I plan to tag Scipy CVS tree tomorrow morning (Estonian time), create tar-balls, etc. See
http://www.scipy.org/development/releasescipy.txt
for relevant tasks.
Please, let me know if there is any reason that I should hold on for tagging CVS tree.
Just for the record, on my Fedora core 2 box, with CVS scipy from a moment ago: planck[~/misc]> python Python 2.3.3 (#1, May 7 2004, 10:31:40) [GCC 3.3.3 20040412 (Red Hat Linux 3.3.3-7)] on linux2 ... In [1]: import scipy In [2]: scipy.__version__ Out[2]: '0.3.1_287.4334' In [3]: scipy.test(level=10) !! No test file 'test_Mplot.py' found for <module 'scipy.xplt.Mplot' from '...-packages/scipy/xplt/Mplot.pyc'> !! No test file 'test_lena.py' found for <module 'scipy.plt.lena' from '...te-packages/scipy/plt/lena.pyc'> ... A bunch more of these, I don't know if they matter. I can post the full list if it matters. Then, after a while: .Testing weibull_max .Testing weibull_min ..... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 986 tests in 115.357s OK So here, things are looking pretty good (except for the gui_thread thingie elsewhere in this thread). Best, f