Oct. 24, 2015
12:16 p.m.
"Gubian, Sylvain" <Sylvain.Gubian@pmi.com> wrote:
The code is ready and passes unit tests and PEP8. We hope it would be a useful addition to SciPy and would be happy to have your opinion.
anneal was thrown out because it was very weak, not because we dislike SA in general. Although it was not clear if the weakness was due to the particular implementation or due to classical SA per se. If an implementation of SA can be shown to be strong I personally see nothing wrong with including it. Sturla