On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Joshua Wilson <josh.craig.wilson@gmail.com
wrote:
P.S. If anyone wants to co-mentor that would be welcome.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Joshua Wilson < josh.craig.wilson@gmail.com> wrote:
Would you be able to add this to the wiki?
Here it is:
https://github.com/scipy/scipy/wiki/GSoC-2016-project-ideas# improve-the-parabolic-cylinder-functions
I have created a new page for 2017: https://github.com/scipy/scipy/wiki/GSoC-2017-project-ideas More ideas/mentors welcome, please edit! A link from http://python-gsoc.org/#ideas to our ideas page will be available within 24 hours I expect. Cheers, Ralf
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Ted Pudlik <tpudlik@gmail.com> wrote:
I agree that it would be very challenging. It would also be more of a research project in applied maths than a straightforward implementation exercise. For the confluent hypergeometric function specifically (on which I've worked unsuccessfully), the main difficulty is that no known algorithm (https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.7786) is reliable throughout parameter space, and in fact finding any combination of algorithms that works well is rather hard.
I have more specific results tucked away somewhere, including interesting plots (one attached as an example---number of correct digits computed by the optimally-truncated asymptotic series as a function of the parameters). I'll try to clean them up and post somewhere for posterity's sake, assuming I won't be able to finish this work myself.[image: 3.png]
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:32 AM Evgeni Burovski < evgeny.burovskiy@gmail.com> wrote:
3. hypergeometric functions would be great, but this might be too difficult. Josh, Nikolay, Ted --- you guys looked at this at some point; any comments?
_______________________________________________ SciPy-Dev mailing list SciPy-Dev@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
_______________________________________________ SciPy-Dev mailing list SciPy-Dev@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
