#693 (Evaluating bivariate piecewise splines at arbitrary points)
Hi all, Do we want to get this: http://www.scipy.org/scipy/scipy/ticket/693 to Scipy 0.7.0, or does it need improvements etc.? It's pretty straightforward; probably the only question is whether >>> zi = spline_object.ev(xi, yi) is a good interface for getting zi[j] = spline(xi[j], yi[j]). [As opposed to BivariateSpline.__call__(x,y), which returns answers evaluated on meshgrid(x,y)] -- Pauli Virtanen
Hi Pauli 2008/11/27 Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi>:
Do we want to get this:
http://www.scipy.org/scipy/scipy/ticket/693
to Scipy 0.7.0, or does it need improvements etc.?
It's pretty straightforward; probably the only question is whether
>>> zi = spline_object.ev(xi, yi)
is a good interface for getting zi[j] = spline(xi[j], yi[j]). [As opposed to BivariateSpline.__call__(x,y), which returns answers evaluated on meshgrid(x,y)]
Did this make it into 0.7? It looks like a sensible change. Cheers Stéfan
Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:30:12 +0200, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
2008/11/27 Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi>:
Do we want to get this:
http://www.scipy.org/scipy/scipy/ticket/693
to Scipy 0.7.0, or does it need improvements etc.?
It's pretty straightforward; probably the only question is whether
>>> zi = spline_object.ev(xi, yi)
is a good interface for getting zi[j] = spline(xi[j], yi[j]). [As opposed to BivariateSpline.__call__(x,y), which returns answers evaluated on meshgrid(x,y)]
Did this make it into 0.7? It looks like a sensible change.
It's not committed. Pauli
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> wrote:
Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:30:12 +0200, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
2008/11/27 Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi>:
Do we want to get this:
http://www.scipy.org/scipy/scipy/ticket/693
to Scipy 0.7.0, or does it need improvements etc.?
Did this make it into 0.7? It looks like a sensible change.
It's not committed.
Hello Pauli, Is there any reason that this hasn't been committed? It looks good to me: it is requested, small, useful, tested, and documented. Stefan has looked it over and given it his approval. If there is a reason to defer this, please update the ticket. Otherwise, please commit the patch and close the ticket. Thanks, -- Jarrod Millman Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs 10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley phone: 510.643.4014 http://cirl.berkeley.edu/
Sun, 07 Dec 2008 03:51:59 -0800, Jarrod Millman wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> wrote:
Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:30:12 +0200, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
2008/11/27 Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi>:
Do we want to get this:
http://www.scipy.org/scipy/scipy/ticket/693
to Scipy 0.7.0, or does it need improvements etc.?
Did this make it into 0.7? It looks like a sensible change.
It's not committed.
Is there any reason that this hasn't been committed? It looks good to me: it is requested, small, useful, tested, and documented. Stefan has looked it over and given it his approval. If there is a reason to defer this, please update the ticket. Otherwise, please commit the patch and close the ticket.
No reason to postpone AFAIK. Committed in r5232. -- Pauli Virtanen
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> wrote:
No reason to postpone AFAIK. Committed in r5232.
Thanks. -- Jarrod Millman Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs 10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley phone: 510.643.4014 http://cirl.berkeley.edu/
participants (3)
-
Jarrod Millman -
Pauli Virtanen -
Stéfan van der Walt