Hi, While taking a look at the ticket 244, there is something I don't quite understand about the current behaviour for scipy fftn. The problem in the ticket is that when both shape and axes arguments are given, fftn wrongly ignore axes when padding the input according to shape. OTOH, scipy fftn accepts shape and axes of different lengths (contrary to numpy fftn), and I don't understand the expected behavior in that case. Should we forbid the case len(shape) != len(axes); if not, what's the expected behavior ? cheers, David