I am cross-posting this to counter some misconceptions about the ASP wikis, including the Topical one. First, I am *thrilled* to see the new Topical page put up by Fernando! The amount and quality of the content is just amazing. The page-of-pages idea wasn't making anyone happy, so it's good to see it go. Second, several people have expressed hesitation in editing the wiki, since they didn't put it up. Folks, it's a *WIKI*! You're *supposed* to edit it! Add, add, add content! All you need is a scipy.org account, which you can make for yourself following the link in the title bar. There is history, so if someone makes a change that isn't popular, we can roll back the change and no harm done. If you want to make major changes to the structure or content posted by others, you can and probably should ask on these lists. But do ask! If it's a good idea, others will agree with you. So, if you are distributing a package and it's not listed, please go add it. Make a scipy.org account, login, go to the wiki, click on the "edit" tab at the top (it only appears if you are logged in), and go to it. There is a link at the top that has more info if you're not sure how to do it. If you're really confused, please suggest improvements to the help document on scipy-dev. And thanks again to Fernando for a lot of work! --jh--
-----Original Message----- From: scipy-user-bounces@scipy.net [mailto:scipy-user-bounces@scipy.net] On Behalf Of Joe Harrington
Second, several people have expressed hesitation in editing the wiki, since they didn't put it up. Folks, it's a *WIKI*! You're *supposed* to edit it! Add, add, add content! All you need is a scipy.org account, which you can make for yourself following the link in the title bar. There is history, so if someone makes a change that isn't popular, we can roll back the change and no harm done.
I second what Joe said. To edit the wiki, you just need to be logged in as a registered user of scipy.org, which requires only an email address. This is intended as a minor deterrent to wiki-spammers, since they could set up a login if they really wanted to, but will probably just move along to a completely open wiki. Please don't let it deter you, as community members, from contributing content. The spirit of wiki development is *community* ownership of content, rather than individual ownership. So please don't worry too much about trodding on anyone's toes (least of all, site managers like me). If you have content that you *do* want to personally control, you can create a page in your user folder on scipy.org (or on your own site), and then link to it from the wiki. Such pages are not part of the wiki, and therefore are editable only by their owners (and by site managers). If you have questions about any of this, please ask me. If I don't know the answer, I'll try to find it. And if I find it, I'll try to add it to the site for the benefit of others. Enjoy! --Janet
Joe Harrington schrieb:
I am cross-posting this to counter some misconceptions about the ASP wikis, including the Topical one.
First, I am *thrilled* to see the new Topical page put up by Fernando! The amount and quality of the content is just amazing. The page-of-pages idea wasn't making anyone happy, so it's good to see it go.
Thanks for the kind comments, I appreciate it (likewise from others who expressed this). Most of that is cut/paste from all the original projects, but it did take quite a bit more time than I had originally planned. But since it seems to be triggering community activity, it was all worth it :)
Second, several people have expressed hesitation in editing the wiki, since they didn't put it up. Folks, it's a *WIKI*! You're *supposed* to edit it! Add, add, add content! All you need is a scipy.org account, which you can make for yourself following the link in the title bar. There is history, so if someone makes a change that isn't popular, we can roll back the change and no harm done. If you want to make major changes to the structure or content posted by others, you can and probably should ask on these lists. But do ask! If it's a good idea, others will agree with you.
I was one of the guilty hesitant ones initially. I guess it's just a change of thinking mode, and old habits and reflexes die hard :) But we seem to be getting into the swing of it, so I'm sure momentum will pick up. Another topic discussed at the ASP BOF/mailings was a bit of a site 'refreshing', beyond the default Plone look. I don't really mind the visuals too much, and I certainly don't expect anyone to put a lot of time into this. But the current site, at least for me, has a real usability problem: the three column layout means that the center column, where the main contents lives, is always very small! And that has incredibly annoying effects. For example, when I browse the mailing list archives, messages are bunched up inside these little boxes and I have to scroll left and right on _every line_ to read them! This happens even if I maximize my browser to full screen. Note that I work on a 1600x1200 monitor, but I have X11 correctly calibrated to use quite a few pixels for font rendering, so in terms of characters, I can fit roughly 130 characters wide in the default fixed-width font I have for mozilla. After the left and right navbars have eaten up 2/3rds of my screen, there is simply not enough space left in the center to show much at all. If the above is not clear, I can provide a screenshot of the problem. This same issue makes it very unpleasant to edit the wiki, as the edit box, is also very small, in the middle of the screen. Hopefully at some point this can be addressed without it requiring too much time. Best, f
-----Original Message----- From: Fernando Perez
Another topic discussed at the ASP BOF/mailings was a bit of a site 'refreshing', beyond the default Plone look. I don't really mind the visuals too much, and I certainly don't expect anyone to put a lot of time into this. But the current site, at least for me, has a real usability problem: the three column layout means that the center column, where the main contents lives, is always very small! And that has incredibly annoying effects.
For example, when I browse the mailing list archives, messages are bunched up inside these little boxes and I have to scroll left and right on _every line_ to read them! This happens even if I maximize my browser to full screen.
After the left and right navbars have eaten up 2/3rds of my screen, there is simply not enough space left in the center to show much at all. If the above is not clear, I can provide a screenshot of the problem. This same issue makes it very unpleasant to edit the wiki, as the edit box, is also very small, in the middle of the screen.
Hopefully at some point this can be addressed without it requiring too much time.
Thanks for the feedback. I also have a list of suggestions from Russell Owen that I haven't taken the time to implement yet. I've removed the right column from the wiki area and the mailing list area. This should require a bit less scrolling. If it's still hard to use, please do send me a screen shot. If there are other areas that could benefit from this change, send me your suggestions. I don't think the right-hand slots (news, recent, and calendar) are really necessary below the top level of pages. --Janet
Janet Swisher schrieb:
I've removed the right column from the wiki area and the mailing list area. This should require a bit less scrolling. If it's still hard to use, please do send me a screen shot. If there are other areas that could benefit from this change, send me your suggestions. I don't think the right-hand slots (news, recent, and calendar) are really necessary below the top level of pages.
Great improvement, Janet, many thanks. I think the documentation area could use the same change. There are also code snippets in there which suffer the same 'squished in a center narrow box' problem that emails and the wiki had. As I've said before, I'm not a website expert. But the default plone layout seems really problematic. I've put up a screenshot at: http://amath.colorado.edu/faculty/fperez/tmp/scipy_main.png so as not to clobber the list with a huge attachment. You can see that the central column is so narrow as to be next to useless. This is with a font layout and browser size which works for pretty much 99% of the websites I visit. Again, I don't know how easy this would be to improve, but at least I'll drop my comments in. At least removing the third column from most of the site (except perhaps the front page) would be already a big help, even if it still requires window maximization. Again, many thanks for your attention to this. Regards, f
participants (3)
-
Fernando Perez
-
Janet Swisher
-
Joe Harrington