stats.randint.rvs(min, max) doesn't always do the right thing. Namely, it will occasionally give a number equal to max. Numeric's RandomArray.randint(min, max) doesn't seem to have this problem (or at least the sample size needed to show it is rather higher than that for stats.randint). Oddly enough, they seem to do the same computation. Any thoughts? -- Robert Kern rkern@ucsd.edu "In the fields of hell where the grass grows high Are the graves of dreams allowed to die." -- Richard Harter