Hi, On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 travo@scipy.org wrote:
Update of /home/cvsroot/world/scipy_core/scipy_base In directory scipy.org:/tmp/cvs-serv7557/scipy_core/scipy_base
Modified Files: function_base.py polynomial.py setup_scipy_base.py Added Files: futil.f Log Message: Added fortran utility functions to scipy_base as part of f2py demo.
Adding Fortran codes to scipy_core contradicts with its design idea. Namely, the modules from scipy_core were factored from the earlier scipy package in order to resolve packaging issues of scipy and f2py2e -- see scipy/PACKAGERS.txt. The solution was that scipy_core f2py2e scipy should be installed strictly in the given order, so, scipy_core may contain only pure Python or C extension modules. So, could futil.f be moved to somewhere under scipy? Pearu
Pearu Peterson wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 travo@scipy.org wrote:
Update of /home/cvsroot/world/scipy_core/scipy_base In directory scipy.org:/tmp/cvs-serv7557/scipy_core/scipy_base
Modified Files: function_base.py polynomial.py setup_scipy_base.py Added Files: futil.f Log Message: Added fortran utility functions to scipy_base as part of f2py demo.
Adding Fortran codes to scipy_core contradicts with its design idea.
Namely, the modules from scipy_core were factored from the earlier scipy package in order to resolve packaging issues of scipy and f2py2e -- see scipy/PACKAGERS.txt. The solution was that scipy_core f2py2e scipy should be installed strictly in the given order, so, scipy_core may contain only pure Python or C extension modules.
So, could futil.f be moved to somewhere under scipy?
Yes, It definitely could. I'll do it. -Travis
participants (2)
-
Pearu Peterson -
Travis Oliphant