![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/9b85a909fbfc71a3ea3275c7872e714d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
4 Oct
2004
4 Oct
'04
5:59 p.m.
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Nils Wagner wrote:
Pearu Peterson wrote:
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Nils Wagner wrote:
AFAIK there is no direct support for sqrtm but you may use funm.
I just discovered that there might be a bug in funm. I have added a test to scipy.linalg.test_matfuncs that demonstrates the bug. So, be aware to check the results of funm(..,sqrt).
That might give a reason to implement sqrtm seperately. What is your opinion ?
The fact that funm is buggy does not give a good reason to implement sqrtm. The following tasks are independent: funm must be fixed and sqrtm must be implemented. Pearu