Ah okay. I find the langauge and punctuation unclear. What about rewording the documentation to "Survival function (sometimes more accurate than the alternate definition of 1-cdf)." or equivalent? I'm happy to submit a PR

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:18 AM <josef.pktd@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Olga Botvinnik <obotvinn@ucsd.edu> wrote:
For the random variables in scipy.stats, I have a question about the documentation. Does the statement "Survival function (1-cdf — sometimes more accurate)." mean:

1. Survival function (also defined as 1-cdf, and the survival function version is sometimes more accurate).
-- or --
2. Survival function (also defined as 1-cdf, and 1-cdf is sometimes more accurate).

 
the second part means:  using sf is in many cases more accurate than 1 - cdf
This applies when we want to evaluate probabilities in the right tail.

1 - norm.cdf(20) is worse than sf(20)      


For some distribution there is no explicit sf implementation, then internally it's also sf = 1 - cdf by default, and accuracy can be low far in the tail.

Josef




 
Thanks!
Olga

_______________________________________________
SciPy-User mailing list
SciPy-User@scipy.org
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user

_______________________________________________
SciPy-User mailing list
SciPy-User@scipy.org
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user