Re: [SciPy-User] Projected Area
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/c28e037b7d92211b8fccf56086bed316.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:54:29 +0200, <scipy-user-request@scipy.org> wrote:
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 12:39:48 -0600 From: "jkhilmer@chemistry.montana.edu" <jkhilmer@chemistry.montana.edu> Subject: Re: [SciPy-User] Projected Area To: SciPy Users List <scipy-user@scipy.org> Message-ID: <CA+S87B_=gAKA56wKdHLd48unBsASCXzcfQu+-iuS3KHe57B0LA@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Lorenzo, Were the previous suggestions not viable due to speed or precision? http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.scientific.user/30450/focus=30464 Jonathan
Hello, Thanks for the link. That was another question I asked some time ago. Here the situation is simpler and I think I do not want to over-engineer the solution: so far it looks like I can get some decent results with an old-fashoned Monte Carlo integration. Cheers Lorenzo
participants (1)
-
Lorenzo Isella