I had the same problem it's a missing g77 This doesn't get installed on some Linux flavours by default particularly in my case RedHat7.1 The picture is slightly confused when looking for rpms becuase the rh numbering diverges from gnu which run 2.95.1, 2.95.2, 2.95.3, 3.00, 3.01 so you need an g77 a redhat rpm for the same redhat revision as your gcc. 2.96 in my case. BTW I don't know why the numbering diverges. Hope this helps. Ed Hartley ------ Distributed Multimedia Research Group Computing Department Lancaster University Lancaster UK LA1 4YR Phone +44 (0) 1524 593675 Fax +44 (0) 1524 593608
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 17 Oct 2001 18:18:24 +0100 Ed Hartley wrote: Ed> BTW I don't know why the numbering diverges. Because RedHat used development versions of gcc to ship whith its products -- never intended for release by the gcc team. And there never was an official release of these version, they made it all the way to 3.0. The RedHat move caused a lot of confusion in many respects! Greetings, Jochen - -- University of North Carolina phone: +1-919-962-4403 Department of Chemistry phone: +1-919-962-1579 Venable Hall CB#3290 (Kenan C148) fax: +1-919-843-6041 Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA GnuPG key: 44BCCD8E -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6-cygwin-fcn-1 (Cygwin) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt and GnuPG <http://www.gnupg.org/> iD8DBQE7zcXWiJ/aUUS8zY4RAg1oAKCpO0FsKLefTDcl1j9/wi6bpphqggCgr1So XMRW5F+9lSlETyJYjYB3NDQ= =0rQp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (2)
-
Hartley, Ed -
Jochen Küpper