Thanks for getting back to me.
Yes the other tests work perfectly well.
On Thursday, December 10, 2015 at 2:46:59 PM UTC, Robert Cimrman wrote:
On 12/09/2015 03:42 PM, Nina Halabi wrote:
> Kindly , I'm trying to install SfePy on a redhat linux workstation.
> I was running the python tests and test_linear_solvers.py failed.
> the command: python run_tests.py --debug tests/test_linear_solvers.py gave
> the below.
> Please note that I got the message "mpi4py (optional) is available in
> version 1.3, but >= 1.3.1 is needed; you may get run-time errors" during
You need to worry about this only when using petsc solvers in parallel. But it
might work anyway.
> gmh@calx039$ python run_tests.py --debug tests/test_linear_solvers.py
> ... condition: 0, err0: 3.588e+00, err: 3.550e-12
> ... solution times (rezidual norms):
> ... 0.05 [s] (3.288e-12) : i20 ls.scipy_iterative cg
> ... 0.07 [s] (2.835e-12) : i21 ls.scipy_iterative bicgstab
> ... 0.09 [s] (2.428e-12) : i10 ls.petsc cg icc
> ... 0.11 [s] (3.550e-12) : i22 ls.scipy_iterative qmr
> ... 1.34 [s] (1.554e-14) : d01 ls.scipy_direct superlu
> ... 1.49 [s] (4.898e-15) : d00 ls.scipy_direct umfpack
> ... 10000000000.00 [s] (1.000e+10) : i00 ls.pyamg ruge_stuben_solver
> ... 10000000000.00 [s] (1.000e+10) : i01 ls.pyamg
> +++ test_solvers: ok
>>>> all passed in 5.02 s
> 1 test file(s) executed in 5.02 s, 0 failure(s) of 1 test(s)
> WARNING! There are options you set that were not used!
> WARNING! could be spelling mistake, etc!
> Option left: name:-sub_pc_type (no value)
It is just a warning, the test passed. It seems that the petsc solvers work ok
despite the warning.
The other tests worked correctly?