
Dear Robert
Kindly, I seem to have a problem with visualizations. I was wondering of it has to do with mayavi2 package? I had a problem installing it because the installation directory is system-owned, to which I don't have administrative access. So I installed the ets toolkit. This has the latest version of mayavi but it imports as mayavi not mayavi2 but that shouldn't be a problem? Here's what I get:
./postproc.py cylinder.vtk
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./postproc.py", line 51, in <module>
from sfepy.postprocess.viewer import (Viewer, get_data_ranges,
File "/home/gmh/sfepy/sfepy/postprocess/viewer.py", line 19, in <module>
from traitsui.api
File
"/opt/ioa/software/python/2.7.8/lib/python2.7/site-packages/traitsui/api.py",
line 36, in <module>
from .editors.api import ArrayEditor
File
"/opt/ioa/software/python/2.7.8/lib/python2.7/site-packages/traitsui/editors/__init__.py",
line 23, in <module>
from .api import ArrayEditor
File
"/opt/ioa/software/python/2.7.8/lib/python2.7/site-packages/traitsui/editors/api.py",
line 24, in <module>
from .code_editor import CodeEditor
File
"/opt/ioa/software/python/2.7.8/lib/python2.7/site-packages/traitsui/editors/code_editor.py",
line 36, in <module>
class ToolkitEditorFactory ( EditorFactory ):
File
"/opt/ioa/software/python/2.7.8/lib/python2.7/site-packages/traitsui/editors/code_editor.py",
line 48, in ToolkitEditorFactory
mark_color = Color( 0xECE9D8 )
File
"/opt/ioa/software/python/2.7.8/lib/python2.7/site-packages/traits/traits.py",
line 489, in __call__
return self.maker_function( *args, **metadata )
File
"/opt/ioa/software/python/2.7.8/lib/python2.7/site-packages/traits/traits.py",
line 1203, in Color
return ColorTrait( *args, **metadata )
File
"/opt/ioa/software/python/2.7.8/lib/python2.7/site-packages/traitsui/toolkit_traits.py",
line 7, in ColorTrait
return toolkit().color_trait( *args, **traits )
File
"/opt/ioa/software/python/2.7.8/lib/python2.7/site-packages/traitsui/toolkit.py",
line 125, in toolkit
ETSConfig.toolkit = toolkit_name
File
"/opt/ioa/software/python/2.7.8/lib/python2.7/site-packages/traits/etsconfig/etsconfig.py",
line 213, in _set_toolkit
"already been set to %s" % (toolkit, self._toolkit)
ValueError: cannot set toolkit to wx because it has already been set to qt4
Many thanks in advance
On Monday, December 14, 2015 at 3:19:38 PM UTC, Nina Halabi wrote:
Dear Robert Thanks for getting back to me. Yes the other tests work perfectly well. Thanks again Cheers
On Thursday, December 10, 2015 at 2:46:59 PM UTC, Robert Cimrman wrote:
Hi Nina,
On 12/09/2015 03:42 PM, Nina Halabi wrote:
Hello
Kindly , I'm trying to install SfePy on a redhat linux workstation.
I was running the python tests and test_linear_solvers.py failed. the command: python run_tests.py --debug tests/test_linear_solvers.py gave the below.
Please note that I got the message "mpi4py (optional) is available in version 1.3, but >= 1.3.1 is needed; you may get run-time errors" during compilation.
You need to worry about this only when using petsc solvers in parallel. But it might work anyway.
Cheers,
gmh@calx039$ python run_tests.py --debug tests/test_linear_solvers.py
<snip>
... condition: 0, err0: 3.588e+00, err: 3.550e-12 ... solution times (rezidual norms): ... 0.05 [s] (3.288e-12) : i20 ls.scipy_iterative cg ... 0.07 [s] (2.835e-12) : i21 ls.scipy_iterative bicgstab ... 0.09 [s] (2.428e-12) : i10 ls.petsc cg icc ... 0.11 [s] (3.550e-12) : i22 ls.scipy_iterative qmr ... 1.34 [s] (1.554e-14) : d01 ls.scipy_direct superlu ... 1.49 [s] (4.898e-15) : d00 ls.scipy_direct umfpack ... 10000000000.00 [s] (1.000e+10) : i00 ls.pyamg ruge_stuben_solver ... 10000000000.00 [s] (1.000e+10) : i01 ls.pyamg smoothed_aggregation_solver +++ test_solvers: ok
all passed in 5.02 s 1 test file(s) executed in 5.02 s, 0 failure(s) of 1 test(s) WARNING! There are options you set that were not used! WARNING! could be spelling mistake, etc! Option left: name:-sub_pc_type (no value) gmh@calx039$
It is just a warning, the test passed. It seems that the petsc solvers work ok despite the warning.
The other tests worked correctly?
r.