Okay sounds good. Keep me posted!
Thank you,
Geoff
On Monday, August 4, 2014 2:21:20 PM UTC-4, Robert Cimrman wrote:
Hi Robert,
When I try the extend_cell_data on the surface of a cube, I get an error: "ValueError: The weights and list don't have the same length." I attached the file. It uses a mesh that is provided with sfepy.. can you take a look?
This is another example where the flux doesn't make sense. If I use only vertices on one face as the source then the flux values are good. But if you run the file as-is, the source extends a bit into the adjacent faces, and the flux results are incorrect. The electric field values look okay, and the voltage field looks fine. My results are as follows:
Source flux: 1.09348063065 Sink flux: -0.90821822135 Block flux: -0.040501111711 Entire surf: 0.298397270469 0.0181174920822 -0.0124582155367 Source surf area: 3.05555373528 Sink surf area: 1.0
I'm pretty sure there is an issue with the surface_flux function. Is
On 08/04/2014 05:21 PM, Geoff Wright wrote: this
something you will be able to look at? I'm trying to decide whether to continue investing in this or switch to another tool/software.
I am actually up to something, stay tuned. (And the surface_flux function is innocent - it comes down to region definitions and gradient computation accuracy).
r.