![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/27f6b03a726ccff3f7a5007b1df6bf8c.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 07/02/2013 03:36 PM, Ankit Mahato wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 July 2013 13:58:20 UTC+5:30, Robert Cimrman wrote:
Now it remains to implement a robust flow solver. Even this small example shows, that the solution is not obtained easily - try decreasing the viscosity, and/or increase the Dirichlet velocity - the solver would not converge.
Yes R,
The solution is not obtained easily. I am looking into it.
PS: Here are blog posts for week 1 & 2 Kindly tell me if this will do before I send it to terri oda:
http://ankitmahato.blogspot.in/2013/07/python-software-foundation-sfepy-gsoc... http://ankitmahato.blogspot.in/2013/07/python-software-foundation-sfepy-gsoc...
It seems ok, just correct the following typo: Navier-Strokes -> Navier-Stokes :)
It would be interesting to see the Peclet number graphs. Also, did you try some other, more interesting, geometries?
r.
Cheers,
r. PS: As mentioned in Terri Oda's e-mail, you should blog about your work so far ASAP!
On 07/01/2013 06:12 PM, Ankit Mahato wrote:
awesome :)
On Monday, 1 July 2013 15:05:16 UTC+5:30, Robert Cimrman wrote:
Hi,
I have removed the "3d only" restriction from the Navier Stokes and related terms. There is also a new example: examples/navier_stokes/navier_stokes2d.py.
r.