On 07/02/2013 04:02 PM, Ankit Mahato wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 July 2013 19:16:37 UTC+5:30, Robert Cimrman wrote:
On 07/02/2013 03:36 PM, Ankit Mahato wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 July 2013 13:58:20 UTC+5:30, Robert Cimrman wrote:
Now it remains to implement a robust flow solver. Even this small
example
shows, that the solution is not obtained easily - try decreasing the viscosity, and/or increase the Dirichlet velocity - the solver would not converge.
Yes R,
The solution is not obtained easily. I am looking into it.
PS: Here are blog posts for week 1 & 2 Kindly tell me if this will do before I send it to terri oda:
http://ankitmahato.blogspot.in/2013/07/python-software-foundation-sfepy-gsoc...
http://ankitmahato.blogspot.in/2013/07/python-software-foundation-sfepy-gsoc...
It seems ok, just correct the following typo: Navier-Strokes -> Navier-Stokes :)
Done.
It would be interesting to see the Peclet number graphs. Also, did you try some other, more interesting, geometries?
Actually I varied the convective velocity and c to observe the variation as I had the graph in my book alongside. It was in accordance but I did not plot it [ grave mistake :( ] and moved ahead at looking into the 3d navier stokes code.
Maybe you could start using the ipython notebooks for that kind of plots/exploration? It might be handy both for your thesis, and the blog.
r.
r.
Cheers,
r. PS: As mentioned in Terri Oda's e-mail, you should blog about your work so far ASAP!
On 07/01/2013 06:12 PM, Ankit Mahato wrote:
awesome :)
On Monday, 1 July 2013 15:05:16 UTC+5:30, Robert Cimrman wrote:
Hi,
I have removed the "3d only" restriction from the Navier Stokes and related terms. There is also a new example: examples/navier_stokes/navier_stokes2d.py.
r.