On Tuesday, 2 July 2013 19:16:37 UTC+5:30, Robert Cimrman wrote:

On 07/02/2013 03:36 PM, Ankit Mahato wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, 2 July 2013 13:58:20 UTC+5:30, Robert Cimrman wrote:
>>
>> Now it remains to implement a robust flow solver. Even this small example
>> shows, that the solution is not obtained easily - try decreasing the
>> viscosity,
>> and/or increase the Dirichlet velocity - the solver would not converge.
>>
>>
> Yes R,
>
> The solution is not obtained easily.
> I am looking into it.
>
> PS: Here are blog posts for week 1 & 2
> Kindly tell me if this will do before I send it to terri oda:
>
> http://ankitmahato.blogspot.in/2013/07/python-software-foundation-sfepy-gsoc.html
> http://ankitmahato.blogspot.in/2013/07/python-software-foundation-sfepy-gsoc_2.html

It seems ok, just correct the following typo: Navier-Strokes -> Navier-Stokes :)

Done.

It would be interesting to see the Peclet number graphs. Also, did you try some
other, more interesting, geometries?

Actually I varied the convective velocity and c to observe the variation as I had the graph in my book alongside. It was in accordance but I did not plot it [ grave mistake :( ] and moved ahead at looking into the 3d navier stokes code.

r.

> Cheers,
>> r.
>> PS: As mentioned in Terri Oda's e-mail, you should blog about your work so
>> far
>> ASAP!
>>
>> On 07/01/2013 06:12 PM, Ankit Mahato wrote:
>>> awesome :)
>>>
>>> On Monday, 1 July 2013 15:05:16 UTC+5:30, Robert Cimrman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have removed the "3d only" restriction from the Navier Stokes and
>>>> related
>>>> terms. There is also a new example:
>>>> examples/navier_stokes/navier_stokes2d.py.
>>>>
>>>> r.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>